The authors utilized an intestinal organoid approach to compare in vitro responses to two CFTR modulator drug combinations and to check potential inter-individual variability in therapeutic response to the triple combination.
[Journal of Cystic Fibrosis]
6445212 6PJP9AZ4 items 1 apa 0 default asc 1 165381 https://www.stemcellsciencenews.com/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3A%22zotpress-34a56323893df4d2bd0a87b2641db98c%22%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%226PJP9AZ4%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A6445212%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Furstova%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222021-08-02%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A2%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%202%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EFurstova%2C%20E.%2C%20Dousova%2C%20T.%2C%20Beranek%2C%20J.%2C%20Libik%2C%20M.%2C%20Fila%2C%20L.%2C%20Modrak%2C%20M.%2C%20Cinek%2C%20O.%2C%20Macek%2C%20M.%2C%20%26amp%3B%20Drevinek%2C%20P.%20%282021%29.%20Response%20to%20elexacaftor%5C%2Ftezacaftor%5C%2Fivacaftor%20in%20intestinal%20organoids%20derived%20from%20people%20with%20cystic%20fibrosis.%20%3Ci%3EJournal%20of%20Cystic%20Fibrosis%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%2C%20%3Ci%3E0%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%280%29.%20%3Ca%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1016%5C%2Fj.jcf.2021.07.006%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1016%5C%2Fj.jcf.2021.07.006%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%20%3Ca%20title%3D%27Cite%20in%20RIS%20Format%27%20class%3D%27zp-CiteRIS%27%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.stemcellsciencenews.com%5C%2Fwp-content%5C%2Fplugins%5C%2Fzotpress%5C%2Flib%5C%2Frequest%5C%2Frequest.cite.php%3Fapi_user_id%3D6445212%26amp%3Bitem_key%3D6PJP9AZ4%27%3ECite%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%20%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Response%20to%20elexacaftor%5C%2Ftezacaftor%5C%2Fivacaftor%20in%20intestinal%20organoids%20derived%20from%20people%20with%20cystic%20fibrosis%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Eva%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Furstova%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Tereza%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Dousova%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Jakub%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Beranek%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Malgorzata%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Libik%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Libor%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Fila%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Martin%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Modrak%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Ondrej%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Cinek%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Milan%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Macek%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Pavel%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Drevinek%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22%3Ch2%3EAbstract%3C%5C%2Fh2%3E%3Cp%3ESuperior%20efficacy%20of%20elexacaftor%5C%2Ftezacaftor%5C%2Fivacaftor%20%28ELX%5C%2FTEZ%5C%2FIVA%29%20over%20tezacaftor%5C%2Fivacaftor%20%28TEZ%5C%2FIVA%29%20in%20people%20with%20cystic%20fibrosis%20%28CF%29%20and%20Phe508del%5C%2FPhe508del%20genotype%20was%20shown%20in%20clinical%20trials.%20We%20utilized%20intestinal%20organoid%20approach%20to%20compare%20%3Ci%3Ein%20vitro%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%20responses%20to%20these%202%20CFTR%20modulator%20drug%20combinations%20and%20to%20check%20potential%20inter-individual%20variability%20in%20therapeutic%20response%20to%20the%20triple%20combination.%20Organoids%20from%2017%20subjects%20with%20Phe508del%5C%2FPhe508del%20were%20screened%20with%20forskolin%20induced%20swelling%20assay.%20Significantly%20larger%20swelling%2C%20when%20exposed%20to%20ELX%5C%2FTEZ%5C%2FIVA%20as%20compared%20to%20TEZ%5C%2FIVA%2C%20was%20observed%20in%2016%20of%20them.%20However%2C%201%20sample%20showed%20no%20additional%20effect%20of%20ELX.%20The%20finding%20of%20unique%20CFTR%20variants%20in%20this%20sample%20indicates%20that%20genetic%20traits%20other%20than%20CF-causing%20CFTR%20mutation%20are%20worth%20exploring%20as%20they%20may%20have%20an%20impact%20on%20the%20definitive%20modulator%20drug%20response.%3C%5C%2Fp%3E%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222021%5C%2F08%5C%2F02%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22English%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%2210.1016%5C%2Fj.jcf.2021.07.006%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%221569-1993%2C%201873-5010%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.cysticfibrosisjournal.com%5C%2Farticle%5C%2FS1569-1993%2821%2901304-7%5C%2Fabstract%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222021-08-05T16%3A27%3A17Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Furstova, E., Dousova, T., Beranek, J., Libik, M., Fila, L., Modrak, M., Cinek, O., Macek, M., & Drevinek, P. (2021). Response to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in intestinal organoids derived from people with cystic fibrosis. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2021.07.006 Cite